By DANIELLE JAMES
Capital News Service
LANSING — As several groups of researchers race to bring back Great Lakes grayling, one program recently got a big assist with a $70,000 grant.
The project is seeking the best design for an incubator to produce a fish that hasn’t been in Michigan waters since 1936. It is part of a multistep effort by the Michigan Arctic Grayling Initiative, a collaboration of more than 40 partners, to make the fish self-sustaining in the Great Lakes.
“Northern Michigan University is looking forward to collaborating on this project with the Michigan DNR,” said Brandon Gerig, an assistant professor of biology. “It’s exciting that the data generated from this project will directly inform Arctic grayling restoration efforts in Michigan.”
The grant will be used to evaluate the success of remote site incubators, according to the Department of Natural Resources.
The researchers are testing the incubators as an alternative to hatcheries, which spawn and raise fish in artificial environments.
Instead of using hatcheries, remote site incubators hatch eggs streamside and allow fish to move directly into the water, according to research by Alan Mock of the Annis Water Resources Institute at Grand Valley State University.
Hatcheries are commonly used to supplement wild fish stocks but can lead to lower reproductive success and survival rates, according to Mock’s research.
That research shows raising fish under more natural conditions could allow them to better acclimate and improve the survival rate after release.
The Arctic grayling was the only abundant stream fish in the salmon family present in the Lower Peninsula until the 1930s.
But logging, overfishing and the introduction of more competitive trout species led to its decline. The last fish on record in Michigan was taken in 1936, according to DNR data.
Past attempts to reintroduce grayling in Michigan included releasing hatchery-reared fish into lakes and streams from the late 1800s through the 1980s, the department says.
But previous efforts failed.
This new project is the second funded by the Consumers Energy Foundation, said DNR Fisheries Division Chief Jim Dexter.
“With their partnership, we are able to get closer to meeting our goals and seeing success,” Dexter said.
The first Consumer’s grant created a system for rating Michigan stream habitats and their compatibility for grayling. The Manistee River watershed was the first site for reintroduction.
Similar research involving grayling is underway in Canadian streams by Heather Veilleux, a molecular biologist at the University of Alberta.
The project looks at eDNA, or genetic material that’s shed into the environment, Veilleux said.
“Any living organism has DNA and it’s shed into the water or the air or the soil,” she said. “The idea with eDNA, especially in the aquatic realm, is to be able to take a scoop of the water and pick out the part of the DNA that you’re looking for in that species.”
Veilleux tested eDNA in streams to identify juvenile grayling, which are harder to find by traditional methods.
She said she hopes to use her data to find where grayling spawn and bring more eggs to those areas.
The Michigan initiative also aims to increase juvenile populations, but is basing the new project on remote site incubator designs that worked for grayling in Montana.
Their success is less certain in Michigan streams, according to the DNR.
But Grand Valley State conducted similar research with Michigan rainbow trout in 2018, according to Mock’s research. Researchers were concerned that sandy Midwest streams would hinder survival rates in incubators.
Three tributaries of the Manistee River were tested using rainbow trout eggs.
The different types of incubators didn’t affect performance, and the hatching success rate in Michigan was similar to that in Montana. The overall survival rate for rainbow trout was 41.3% in 2018 and 52.4% in 2019, compared with 45% for Montana’s grayling eggs.
No matter where they’re located, Arctic grayling are highly sensitive to environmental stress, Veilleux said.
“Changes in temperature, salinity, contaminants and habitat fragmentation, like when culverts are constructed, all affect them,” she said.
Danielle James writes for Great Lakes Echo.