By TAYLOR HAELTERMAN
Capital News Service
LANSING — Increased ozone emissions in several southern Michigan counties could lead to new motor vehicle maintenance inspections — if researchers can’t blame them on western wildfires.
Ozone in the upper atmosphere is important and helps block the sun’s rays.
But ground-level ozone can cause or worsen health problems for people with asthma, heart conditions or other respiratory problems, said Stephanie Hengesbach, a meteorologist in the Air Quality Division of the Department of Environment, Great Lakes and Energy.
It develops from a chemical reaction between pollutants and sunlight.
Parts of Michigan are in marginal nonattainment, the first level of failing to meet air quality standards set by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Those areas could go up to moderate nonattainment, a level that could trigger new regulations.
Those areas are Livingston, Macomb, Monroe, Oakland, St. Clair, Washtenaw, Wayne and Berrien counties and parts of Allegan and Muskegon counties.
To assess ozone levels, researchers average the fourth-highest emission day of each of three years.
The 2020 numbers are being evaluated, but based on what regulators have seen so far, they are “fairly certain” the monitors are showing a yearly average not far above the levels that would trigger additional regulation, Hengesbach said
“To be honest it’s not much over the standard,” Hengesbach said. “Some by even less than 1 part-per-billion, so I don’t want anyone to think that it’s well over the standard that we have in place.”
There’s still a chance to bring down that average by proving ozone levels increases on specific days are due to an exceptional event such as the California wildfires.
An exceptional event is an unpreventable natural incident. If it causes emission increases, the EPA can determine whether to exclude those days from the ozone calculations.
But wildfire smoke may not be the cause of Michigan’s increases, so extensive research and planning are necessary, and it’s too early in the process to have come to any conclusions, Hengesbach said.
“Just because there is wildfire smoke over our region does not mean that we automatically have high pollution levels,” she said. “We did have some instances in early and mid-September where we had wildfire smoke clearly over our region. However it did not affect our air quality at all.”
Making that case to the EPA isn’t easy, Hengesbach said.
The department should complete the exceptional event analysis by the spring.
Then state regulators will decide whether to bring it to the EPA, said Bob Irvine, the supervisor of Environment, Great Lakes and Energy’s state implementation plan development unit.
The federal agency will then decide whether to exclude the exceptional event dates, Irvine said.
If not, the EPA will designate areas to be bumped up to moderate nonattainment in the summer of 2022, Irvine said.
The state will then draft a plan and implement practices to reduce emissions.
That could mean a vehicle inspection maintenance program in the affected areas to measure air pollutants released in exhaust. A vehicle couldn’t be registered until it passes the inspection.
It could also mean reducing volatile organic compounds by 15%, Irvine said.
Those are gases emitted from things like fuels, industrial practices and household chemicals that react with the sun’s rays to create ozone. These changes would likely be made by implementing regulations on the industrial level.
Tina Reynolds, the Michigan Environmental Council environmental health program director, questions the use of the wildfires as an exceptional event.
“If we are successful, what does that really mean?” she said. “It means that we are continuing to put folk’s health at risk.”
If the wildfires are determined to be an exceptional event, new regulations are likely unneeded.
But Reynolds said the return of the fires each year mean they’re no longer exceptional. They may be an event that states need to anticipate and plan for to protect public health, she said.
“I, for one, think that the California wildfires are becoming less and less exceptional every year,” she said.
The Michigan Environmental Council would likely oppose the use of an exceptional event to avoid regulations, she said.
Members of the public should speak up during public comment periods because they’ll be living with the effects of the pollution, she said.
“Well, why do we have air quality standards in the first place?” Reynolds said. “To protect public health, right? So that we can live and work and play.”
Taylor Haelterman reports for Great Lakes Echo.