The secret savior of US and Canada’s shared waters isn’t one person

Print More

Capital News Service

LANSING — Forty percent of the border between the United States and Canada is water — the fate of which lies in the hands of about 50 people.

Well, sort of.

The International Joint Commission (IJC) has about that many people. 

Canada and the U.S. created the agency in 1909 to protect all bodies of water along their shared border. It’s guided by the Boundary Waters Treaty, which was created to resolve disputes between the two countries over transboundary waters.

“It’s a wonderful tool that costs next to nothing,” said Murray Clamen, an engineer and the retired secretary of the commission.

Yet it’s rarely used because few have heard of it.

“Most politicians, unless they have a reason to be aware of the IJC because it’s something in their constituency, they don’t even know it exists,” Clamen said.

But Clamen and Daniel Macfarlane are looking to change that with their new book, “The First Century of the International Joint Commission.” It covers the history of the countries’ border waters, the IJC’s shift from an emphasis on water flow to ecosystem conservation and the history of the relationship between the U.S. and Canada.

Macfarlane is an associate professor in the Institute of the Environment and Sustainability at Western Michigan University

The binational agency is so unique that it’s magical, Clamen said.

Most countries like to use government-to-government negotiations when dealing with transboundary issues, he said. But that’s a problem because each country has its own interests in mind.

“In an IJC situation, people don’t represent their country. They actually represent the treaty,” he said. “They try to get the best solution taking into account the treaty itself.”

Many organizations around the world try to emulate the IJC, but they aren’t as successful without a treaty to facilitate their relationship, Clamen said.

“Two countries that are not equal are equal when you look at them through the eyes of the [Boundary Waters] treaty,” he said. “And that’s the magic of the IJC.”

Governments aren’t required to consult the IJC before making environmental decisions. And when the IJC makes recommendations, the advice is seldom taken anymore, Macfarlane said.

But when the governments have taken the IJC’s advice, it’s proven successful.

After events like Lake Erie being declared dead in the late 1960s and the Cuyahoga River catching fire 13 times from 1868 to 1969, the IJC proposed the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement in 1972, Macfarlane said. It’s responsible for keeping the lakes clean for drinking and recreation and safe from harmful pollutants.

“It was based on decades of IJC science recommendations,” he said. “So it never could have happened without the IJC.”

Though the organization has little power on its own, Macfarlane sees the IJC as a vital ingredient for addressing issues like climate change and pollution in the Great Lakes.

It’s a book about the past that informs the present and the future, Macfarlane said.

Clamen said, “My hope and Dan’s hope is that more people will become educated about the IJC and that the governments will understand just how vital it is to the Canada and U.S. relationship.” 

The book is also great for anyone interested in the history of the relationship between the countries or who wants to better understand the problems facing the Great Lakes today, he said.

Ramya Swayamprakash, a Great Lakes historian now studying history at Michigan State University, said the book has been enjoyable.

 “I appreciated the topics covered in the Great Lakes section, especially the chapters on lake water levels and air pollution,” Swayamprakash said. “I am definitely learning a lot from the book and would recommend it to anyone interested in learning more about environmental diplomacy.”

The book can be downloaded for free from the University of Calgary Press.

Cassidy Hough writes for Great Lakes Echo.

Comments are closed.