By KEVIN DUFFY
Capital News Service
LANSING— A fight over logging restrictions is delaying federal protection of the northern long-eared bat, a Great Lakes species already decimated in the American Northeast.
A decision on whether to list the bat as endangered or threatened has been pushed back to April.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, which has federal jurisdiction over protected species, is using the extra time to respond to the unexpected controversy, said Mollie Matteson, a senior scientist and a bat disease specialist at the Center for Biological Diversity.
Endangered means a species is at high risk of extinction in the wild, according to the International Union for the Conservation of Nature. Under federal law, a threatened species “is likely to become an endangered species within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range.”
Forest industry officials worry a federal listing will hinder logging. They propose state-enforced operational guidelines as an alternative.
The dispute lies between timber industry advocates and bat conservationists, but political leaders and state delegations also have a stake in the issue, Matteson said.
The Center for Biological Diversity, a Tucson, Ariz., nonprofit organization dedicated to the long-term protection of species, petitioned the Fish & Wildlife Service to classify the long-eared bat as threatened or endangered in 2010. And a Defenders of Wildlife petition for its endangered listing is closing in on its 50,000-signature goal.
Fish and Wildlife Service officials recommended the listing, later distributing guidelines on how best to log forests without harming the bats.
With the species still officially unprotected, the guidelines lack the force of law, said Matteson.
Enforced or not, the recommendations, which suggest restricted logging from April through October, have fueled industry-led controversy.
The proposed guidelines for long-eared bats follow current restrictions for the Indiana bat, one of the first species listed under the Endangered Species Act, said Rob Mies, director of the Organization for Bat Conservation based at the Cranbrook Institute of Science in Bloomfield Hills.
An endangered listing is a decision backed by science, not by economics or politics, he said.
Some factions of industry are pushing for a “threatened” listing, which allows special rules to be written that would exempt certain activities such as logging in the bats’ native habitat.
“Timber management programs in Wisconsin and Michigan have begun to address habitat features that support long-eared roosting,” said Henry Schienebeck, executive director of the Great Lakes Timber Professionals Association.
Long-eared bats, more than any other species of bat in America, are associated with old-growth forests, Matteson said.
These old growth forests provide many of the habitat features – including snags and hollows – that long-eared bats prefer. And industry officials say these trees, often containing dead or dying sections, are the kind that logging operations tend to avoid.
But bats are opportunistic and generally look for any type of tree meeting their reproductive and resting needs, said Matteson.
The primary threat to the bat is white-nose syndrome, a fungal disease that takes the bats’ fat reserves, killing them during hibernation.
Its presence in the Great Lakes region was confirmed two years ago and in Michigan in April.
Stopping the disease has been nearly impossible, and white-nose syndrome is still without a cure.
But bat advocates say other threats can be minimized to improve the fate of the mammal.
“The argument that the focus on protection of the bats should be reserved for the syndrome does not take into account factors having an influence on the species’ survival,” said Matteson.
Other threats – habitat loss, hibernation disturbance and environmental toxins – play a role in the near-decimation of the species in the Northeast.
Matteson said those threats are factors federal and state governments can control.
Mies, who is also the coordinator for the North American Bat Conservation Alliance, said, “Many are led to believe this species is endangered, and we should protect it for intrinsic reasons.
“But if these bats are to disappear, people will begin to see a loss of food production and an increased need for forest management,” he said.
That’s because bats eat lots of the same moths and beetles that destroy crops and forests.
“States generally have no issue with the need for long-eared bat listing – it’s an issue of details,” Mies said.
As conservation advocates push for a listing that protects both the species and its surrounding habitat, some industry officials question the role of habitat in protecting bats.
Schienebeck said, “The timber industry has already initiated habitat rehabilitation and doesn’t see species limited by this habitat.”
Despite concerns about their long-term survival, Great Lakes bats aren’t dying yet.
Experts say the pattern for the fungal disease takes three years to reach peak intensity. This is the third winter the disease has been in the Great Lakes, so the bats’ future is at stake, they say.
The final listing determination by the Fish & Wildlife Service was originally scheduled for Oct. 2 but has been delayed until April 2.
Kevin Duffy writes for Great Lakes Echo.
Additional resources for CNS editors:
Petition to list the northern long-eared bat as threatened or endangered: http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/campaigns/bat_crisis_white-nose_syndrome/pdfs/petition-Myotisleibii-Myotisseptentrionalis.pdf